The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging police harassment regarding civil dispute settlements. It restrained the police from interfering with personal liberty except per legal procedure.
Police directed not to interfere with petitioners unless per law established procedure followed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.21216 OF 2017
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in settling the civil disputes of respondent No.4 in the police station of respondent No.3 by frequently calling the petitioners to the police station of respondent No.3 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to pressurize the petitioners to settle the civil disputes with respondent No.4.
2
shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
Date: 6.7.2017 AMD
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.21216 OF 2017
DATE: 6.7.2017
AMD
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the police action of repeatedly calling petitioners to the station to settle civil disputes violates personal liberty.
Whether a writ of Mandamus should be issued to restrain the police from harassing petitioners regarding civil disputes.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner(s)
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
Respondent No.4
C. Praveen Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
