A common order in two writ petitions, the High Court dismissed the petitions as the petitioners did not press their prayers following the respondent's issuance of legal proceedings. The applications were closed.
Writ petitions dismissed; miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION Nos.19665 and 21016 of 2008
COMMON ORDER:
Heard Sri Mehdi Hussain for petitioners and Sri Ramakanth Reddy for the 1st respondent.
Sri Rama Kanth Reddy places on record the proceedings dated 22-03-2017 and submits that the 1st respondent has examined the legal objection raised in the writ petitions and with a view to proceed against the petitioners in accordance with law, issued the proceedings referred to above.
Sri Medhi Hussain having regard to the above proceedings issued by the 1st respondent, does not press the writ prayers.
The Writ Petitions are dismissed accordingly. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_____________ S. V. BHATT, J
Date: 24-03-2017 Prv
Petitioners
1st Respondent
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
