Pachharla Jayachandra, v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P.No.2041 of 2013…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
W.P.No.2041 of 2013
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the learned Government Pleader for Registration and Stamps appearing for respondent No.3.
- Petitioner purchased plot Nos.10 and 11 in Sy. No.512-3 of B.K. Palle Revenue village, Madanapalle Municipal Area, Chittoor District on 23-02-2004; certain third parties, according to the petitioner are intending to purchase the same; but when they approached the 3rd respondent, he was orally stating that the petitioner’s property is not private land, that it was Government land and so he cannot give market value certificate and cannot entertain any document for registration. Petitioner contends that he produced the list of Government lands announced by 2nd respondent in respect of the subject village, in which also there is no mention of the subject land, but still the 3rd respondent was refusing to give market value details.
- Petitioner contends that he approached 2nd respondent to issue No Objection Certificate (NOC) which could be submitted to 3rd respondent, but the 2nd respondent is not issuing such NOC though the details of list of Government lands relating to a subject village did not mention Sy.No.512-3.
MSRJ W.P.No.2041 of 2013
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Government Pleader for Revenue
- respondent
Government Pleader for Registration and Stamps
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/2041/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court