A learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.Nos.6120 of 1986 and 13097 of 1987 held that various contentions raised by the petitioners therein have to be considered by the District Collector afresh after affording an opportunity to them. Accordingly, the learned Single Judge by his order, dated 04.04.1989, quashed the order, dated 18.12.1984, of the District Collector and the petitioners therein were given liberty to submit their objections within a period of two months from 04.04.1989. Among the petitioners therein, there were legal representatives of the original assignees as well as the subsequent purchasers. Against the order passed by the learned Single Judge, the petitioners filed W.A.No.860 of 1989 and batch. A Division Bench of this Court vide judgment, dated 25.09.1995, allowed the same by setting aside the order of the learned Single Judge dated 04.04.1989, and quashed the orders passed by the District Collector dated 18.12.1984 and 17.07.1985. Aggrieved by the same, the Government preferred Civil Appeal Nos.13010-19 of 1996 with Civil Appeal Nos.2692-93 of 1997 before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, which, in turn, disposed of the appeals by remanding the matter to the Division Bench with the following observations:
