This order addresses the petitioner's grievance regarding a pending appeal against his removal from service. The court directed the 2nd respondent society to dispose of the appeal within eight weeks and provided no order as to costs.
Direction to 2nd respondent to decide the pending appeal within 08 weeks and communicate decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No.18821 OF 2017
O R D E R :
Petitioner’s grievance is that the appeal filed by him on 12.08.2016 before the 2nd respondent challenging his removal from service of the 3rd respondent-Society vide order dt.08.06.2016 has not yet disposed of by the 2nd respondent.
______________________________ M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
12th June, 2017. gra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to direction to the respondent society to decide the pending appeal expeditiously regarding his removal from service.
Petitioner
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
3rd Respondent
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
