A single-judge order dismissing a writ petition where the Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the matter arose from a civil land dispute, advising parties to approach the Tahsildar.
Writ petition dismissed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
W.P. No.17554 OF 2013
ORDER:
No representation for petitioner.
The Assistant Government Pleader (Home) places on record
the written instructions dated 26.07.2013 which reads as follows:
“ It is submitted that earlier on 7.1.2012 the petitioner had lodged a complaint with this respondent Police Station, stating that, the 5th respondent had interfered in her land to an extent of Ac.4.40 cents, situated at Marripaka Village, Jaggampet Mandal, East Godavari District and threatened with dire consequences. After enquiry it was revealed that, there was a civil dispute between the petitioner and the 5th respondent herein with regard to the said land, hence this respondent had suggested the petitioner-complainant and 5th respondent to approach the Tahsildar, Jaggampeta Mandal for redressal.”
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as
to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________ S.V.BHATT, J_
Date: 28.11.2017 Stp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging police inter-meddling in a land dispute warrants any relief.
Petitioner
Assistant Government Pleader (Home)
5th Respondent
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
