Petitioners filed a writ for mandamus regarding implementation of a tribunal order. The Supreme Court found the cause infructuous as the underlying order in the parallel writ petition was set aside by a separate order.
Petition declared infructuous. Interim relief petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
and
The Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Shyam Prasad Writ Petition No.14140 of 2017
Date: 07.08.2017
Between :
N.Anjaneyulu, S/o Mallaiah and six others.
… Petitioners
and
The State of Telangana, reptd by its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Hyderabad and nine others.
…Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr. Ch.Ganesh Counsel for the respondents : GP for Services (TS)
The Court made the following:
CVNR, J & GSP, J WP.No.14140 of 2017 Dt: 07.08.2017
2
Order: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in implementing Order, dated 06.11.2015, in O.A.No.5987 of 2015 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad.
Today by a separate order passed by us in Writ Petition No.25504 of 2017, we have set aside the afore-mentioned order in the OA. Following the same, the cause in this Writ Petition
does not survive for adjudication.
infructuous.
WPMP.No.17535 2017, filed by the petitioners for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous.
______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J)
_________________ (G.Shyam Prasad, J)
Dt: 07h August, 2017 lur
N. Anjaneyulu and six others
The State of Telangana and nine others
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
G. Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
