Disposed
Routhu Simhachalam, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Panchayat Raj and Rural
Telangana HCWP/13743/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.13743 OF 2017
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.21199 of 2015, dated 10.07.2015. A copy of the said order is also placed on record along with the material papers. Paragraph 2 of the said order reads as under:
“Since a recommendation is made by the Mandal Parishad Development Officer, after conducting an enquiry, into the eligibility of the persons and said recommendation is stated to be pending before Project Director, DRDA, Srikakulam, the writ petition is disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits, directing the Project Director, DRDA, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District, to consider the said report and if the petitioners are found to be eligible for suitable pension, to take further course of action for sanction and release of the pension, payable to them. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.”
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition,
shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
A.V.SESHA SAI, J
APRIL 18, 2017 YVL
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.13743 OF 2017
Date: 18.04.2017
YVL
A.V. SESHA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court