Rajani Devadas Vs The Chairman and Managing Director

Petitioner claims that he is unfit to perform his duties as he is suffering with heart problem. He, therefore, submitted a representation on 28.09.2016 requesting to refer him to Medical Board for reassessment of his eligibility to do employment and if Medical Board declares him unfit to provide dependant employment. It appears that said representation is not disposed of so far.

¶16

When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned standing counsel represented that writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to consider the representation of the petitioner.

¶17

Having regard to this submission, writ petition is disposed of, without expressing any opinion on merits, directing the General Manager (Personnel) (3^rd respondent) to examine the representation submitted by the petitioner on 28.9.2016 with reference to referring him to Medical Board and the provision of dependent employment and pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶18

P. NAVEEN RAO, J

¶19

Date: 17.04.2017 KA

Rajani Devadas v. The Chairman and Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajani Devadas v. The Chairman and Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.v.a.Raju, Vs The Apsrtc

Capt. Vepa Ramprasad, Vs Union of India

K.S.Satyanarayana, Vs Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited

N. Ramesh Babu, Vs T.S.R.T.C.

Dr. K.N.Sree Kavitha, Vs The State of Telangana

Sk.Ibrahim Vs Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation