NalajalaKantarao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Prl Secretary

HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE A. RAMALI NGESWARA RAO

Writ Petition No. 4352, 11667, 12801, 12937, 21677, 21883 and 22149 of 2017

Common Order :

Since the issue involved in all the writ petitions is one and the same, they are being disposed of by this common order.

¶5

When the matters are taken up for consideration, it is brought to

¶6

the notice of this Court that in similar circumstances this Court in W.P.No.402 of 2017 on 7.2.2017 passed the following order:

¶7

“Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3 and the learned counsel for 4^th respondent, this Court is of the considered opinion that ends of justice would be served if the petitioner as well as 4^th respondent are permitted to raise their claims before the respondent authorities with regard to their right over the property.

¶8

For the aforesaid reasons, the Writ Petition is disposed of, keeping it open to the petitioner as well as 4^th respondent to raise their respective claims before the 3^rd respondent and it is open for the 3^rd respondent to consider the same and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.”

¶9

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in

¶10

these cases also, no award was passed and the petitioners are claiming title to the land.

¶11

In such circumstances, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms

¶12

of the above order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶13

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions pending in these

¶14

Writ Petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶15

____________________________ A. RAMALI NGESWARA RAO, J

¶16

Date: 04.09.2017 Nsr

NalajalaKantarao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Prl Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

NalajalaKantarao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Prl Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Vasundhara Agro Sciences, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep its Principal Secretary

M/s.Teja Agro Tech, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep its Principal Secretary

Techno Soft Solutions, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Makkapeta Mahila Mutually Aided Cooperative Thrift and Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Panguluri Srinivasa Rao , Srinu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

G.Lakshmana Murthy, S/o.G.Gangappa, Vs The State of A.P. Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Civil Supplies