This order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner, with no substantive adjudication of merits.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION No.12413 of 2011
ORDER:
Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel for petitioner,
submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for
adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
As a sequel there to, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Date: 30.10.2017 KA
Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
