The Court disposed of a writ petition challenging FIR registration after the investigation was completed, directing the accused to be proceeded against according to law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.1182 OF 2017
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed challenging the registration of F.I.R.No.145 of 2016 by the second respondent on the basis of the complaint lodged by the third respondent.
This Court, by order, dated 06.01.2017, while issuing notice before admission directed the second respondent to proceed with the investigation without arresting the petitioners.
A counter affidavit is filed by the second respondent stating that twenty witnesses were examined and investigation was completed. Except the petitioners, all the remaining accused were arrested on 13.02.2016 and sent for remand.
In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to take further action in accordance with law in view of the completion of the investigation.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
__________________________ A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO , J 12.04.2017 pln
Petitioners
Second Respondent
Third Respondent
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
