Disposed

N.Dada Peer v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Principal

Telangana HC25 Apr 2017WP/10954/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to issue appropriate orders regarding the suspension of the petitioner's Fair Price Shop authorization after providing notice and an opportunity of hearing within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

The Revenue Divisional Officer directed to pass appropriate orders within six weeks after providing notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

N.Dada Peer Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.10954 of 2017

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This writ petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the following relief:

¶5

“ to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents 2 and 3 in continuing the suspension of Petitioner's authorization in pursuance of Proceedings Rc.D1CS/ 2360/ 2016 dt.08-11-2016 issued by Respondent No.3 there by suspending petitioner's authorization with respect to Fair Price Shop No.3, Gooty Town, Anantapur District as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents to restore petitioner's authorization with respect to Fair Price Shop No.3, Gooty Town, Anantapur District.”

¶6

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies.

¶7

The petitioner is a Fair Price Shop dealer in respect of Shop No.3 of Gooty Town, Anantapur District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur – 3^rd respondent vide proceedings in Rc.D1CS/ 2360/ 2016 dated 08-11-2016, issued show cause notice cum suspension order to the petitioner asking him to show cause as to why his authorization should not be cancelled. In response to the same, the petitioner submitted explanation on 16.11.2016.

¶8

According to learned counsel for the petitioner, despite considerable length of time, no final orders have been passed by the 2^nd respondent and because of the same, the petitioner is sustaining heavy loss and injury.

¶9

¶10

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this Court is of the considered opinion that the ends of justice would be served if the 2^nd respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders pursuant to the show cause notice cum suspension order.

¶11

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Revenue Divisional Officer, Anantapur – 2^nd respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders pursuant to the show cause notice cum suspension order, dated 08.11.2016, by taking into consideration the explanation offered by the petitioner on 16.11.2016, after giving notice and opportunity of hearing, to the petitioner within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶12

Miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed in consequence. No order as to costs.

¶13

_______________ A.V. SESHA SAI, J

¶14

April 25, 2017 KTL

N.Dada Peer v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Dada Peer v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meka Koti Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Chevulla Maddi Chandravva Vs Northern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited

M B Reddy and 67 Othrs Vs Prl.Secretary ( La) and 6 Others

Sunkavalli Veerabhadra Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Durga Narayana Swamy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal

M/s. Karunamaya Constructions, Vs The Singareni Colleries Company Limited