Writ petition filed challenging alleged arbitrary proceedings against a shop shifting application. Court recorded submission that shifting was allowed and closed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.10634 OF 2017
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 4th respondent in RC No.279/ 2015/ B3, dated 02.03.2017, as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the application for shifting of the shop of the petitioner.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Prohibition, on written instructions dated 22.03.2017 submitted that the petitioner’s application was considered and as a matter of fact, shifting of the shop has already been allowed to the licenced premises.
Recording the said submission of the learned Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petition pending if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
March 28, 2017
KTL
Petitioner
4th Respondent
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
