Single judge dismissed writ petition challenging inaction by police authorities regarding land possession complaints by way of acceptance of stand that petitioner was not approached as per station records.
None. Petitioner given liberty to approach respondent No. 3 if she has genuine grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 10546 of 2017
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed challenging the inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 3 in spite of the complaints, dated 23.04.2016 and 17.03.2017, lodged by the petitioner with regard to the land possessed by her.
Learned Government Pleader for Home, on the basis of written instructions, submits that the verification of the station records shows that no complaints, dated 23.04.2016 and 17.03.2017, were received from the petitioner. Respondent No.3Station House Officer, Buttaigudem Police Station, West Godavari District tried to secure the presence of the petitioner at the given address, but she was not available in the Village. Whenever the petitioner approaches the Police along with the complaint, necessary action would be taken as per law.
In view of the above, the writ petition is closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent No.3 if she has a genuine grievance.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________ A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO,J
Dt:03.04.2017 kdl
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
