Allowed

Syed Afzal, v. The Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court

Telangana HC9 Aug 2017WA/880/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the writ appeal against an Industrial Tribunal award. The Court directed the Bank and its Branch Manager to engage the appellant as a casual or temporary peon with preference over juniors for vacancies arising during a specific interregnum.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to engage the appellant as a casual or temporary peon with preference over other juniors appointed during the interregnum.

Syed Afzal, Vs The Central Government… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD

¶2

Writ Appeal No.880 of 2017

¶3

DATED:09-08-2017

¶4

Between:

¶5

Syed Afzal … Appellant And

¶6

The Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cumLabour Court, Government of India’ Ministry of Labour Rep. by its Presiding Officer M-2 Block, Manoranjan Complex MJ Road, Hyderabad-1 and others … Respondents

¶7

COUNSEL FOR THE PEITITONER: Mr. A.K. Jayaprakash Rao COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS: -

¶8

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶9

CVNR, J & GSP, J WA 880/2017

¶10

¶11

ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy)

¶12

This writ appeal is filed against order dt.20.4.2017 in Writ Petition No.3964 of 2006, confirming order dt.31.5.2003 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum- Labour Court (for short, “the Tribunal”), Hyderabad, in L.C.I.D. No.85 of 2002.

¶13

At the hearing, Mr. A.K. Jayaprakash Rao, learned counsel for the appellant, submitted that his client will be satisfied if respondent No.4, which is stated to have been taken over by the Kotak Mahindra Bank, and respondent No.5 – Branch Manager of the said Bank are directed to implement the direction of the Tribunal, contained in its Award, which reads as under:

¶14

“…However, the respondent No.2 is directed that in future if any causal or temporary peon is appointed the petitioner shall be given preference over other juniors taking his initial date of appointment as 20.11.2000.”

¶15

In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, the writ appeal is disposed of directing respondent Nos.4 and 5 to consider the case of the appellant to engage him as casual or temporary peon by giving preference to him over other juniors, if any, appointed during the interregnum between the passing of the Award and today.

¶16

As a sequel to disposal of the writ appeal, W.A.M.P. No.1723 of 2017 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.

¶17

__________________________ C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J

¶18

_________________________ GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J

¶19

09-8-2017

¶20

bnr

¶21

CVNR, J & GSP, J WA 880/2017

¶22

Syed Afzal, v. The Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Afzal, v. The Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Ntr University of Health Sciences, Vs Dr. Deen Dayal Bung

Union of India Vs E.Sreeramulu

K. Shedrak, Vs The District Collector, (Sw)

M/s. Bharsat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Vs Central Administrative Tribunal

The State of Telangana Vs M.Venkata Narasirnha Goud

M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, Vs Central Administrative Tribunal, Reptd by its Registrar