Page or paragraph not pressed. The Writ Appeal dismissed. No other order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
Writ Appeal No.871 of 2016
Judgment: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
This appeal, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, is preferred against the proceedings dated 17.8.2016 in W.P. No. 23728 of 2016 issuing notice returnable in four weeks, and in directing that the writ petition be posted for hearing in February, 2017.
Sri Tarun G. Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that, since the learned Judge had posted the matter for hearing in February, 2017, it would suffice if the appellants-writ petitioners are permitted to agitate their grievance in the Writ Petition, and the learned Single Judge is directed to take up the Writ Petition for hearing at an early date.
It would be wholly inappropriate for us to decide the board of the learned Judge before whom such matters are listed. We have, however, no reason to doubt that, on a request being made by the appellants-writ petitioners for an early hearing, such a request would be given its due consideration.
The Writ Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
___________________ (M. GANGA RAO, J)
6th October, 2017 pnb
2
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
Writ Appeal No.871 of 2016
Date: 6.10.2017
pnb
Ramesh Ranganathan
M. Ganga Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
