MD Asad v. Prl.Secy., Houseing Dept., Hyd., and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the Writ Appeal filed against a single judge order deferring hearing of a writ petition. No appeal lay against the mere deferral.
The Court dismissed the Writ Appeal filed against a single judge order deferring hearing of a writ petition. No appeal lay against the mere deferral.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
Writ Appeal No.1525 of 2017
Judgment: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
This appeal, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, is preferred against the proceedings in W.P. No. 31885 of 2017 dated 19.9.2017.
In the order under appeal, the learned Single Judge noted the submission urged on behalf of the Housing Board, that auction has already been conducted in respect of the subject property; the bid went for a sum of Rs.70,500/- per square yard as against Rs.200/- offered by the petitioner, which he had not availed in the year 2000 itself. The Learned Single Judge directed notice, returnable in four weeks, to be issued.
As has been held by a Division Bench of this Court in Kunala Subbarao vs. P.Nagaratnayamma1 , mere deferring hearing of the Writ Petition without passing any order in the WPMP, would not amount to a “judgment”, in which case alone, would an appeal lie under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent.
As no appeal, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, would lie against the action of the learned Single Judge in merely deferring hearing of the admission of the Writ Petition, we see no reason to entertain this appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent.
The Writ Appeal fails and is, accordingly, dismissed. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
__________________ (M. GANGA RAO, J)_
16th October, 2017
pnb
1 AIR 1982 AP 443
2
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
Writ Appeal No.1525 of 2017
Date: 16.10.2017
pnb
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
M. GANGA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court