The Acting Chief Justice dismissed eight Writ Appeals and a Writ Petition as not pressed for want of instructions from the learned counsel for the appellants. Proceedings concluded without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
WRIT APPEAL Nos.1180, 1145, 1146, 1198, 1199, 1202, 1203, 1204 of 2005 AND WRIT PETITION No.20224 of 2003
COMMON JUDGMENT : (per Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Sri Challa Gunaranjan, Learned Counsel for the appellants states that they have no instructions to appear in any of these eight Writ Appeals and the Writ Petition. All the eight Writ Appeals and the Writ Petition are, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.
______________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ
M. GANGA RAO, J
Date: 12.10.2017.
MRKR
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
M. GANGA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
