Writ appeal dismissed as the Court was not inclined to entertain it without deciding the pending interlocutory application in the underlying writ petition. Interim relief application declared infructuous.
Writ appeal dismissed without deciding merits; interim relief application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD WRI T APPEAL No.1154 of 2017
21.08.2017
Between:
S.Rajashaker Reddy and others and The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad and others
..Appellants
and ..Respondents
Counsel for the appellants: Mr.J.Sudheer Counsel for respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Services (TS) The Court made the following:
2
CVNR,J & GSP,J W.A.No.1154 of 2017 21.08.2017
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
This writ appeal arises out of order, dated 16.08.2017, in W.P.No.26656 of 2017, whereby the learned Single Judge has adjourned the writ petition filed by the appellants by two weeks to enable the respondents to file counter-affidavit.
3
CVNR,J & GSP,J W.A.No.1154 of 2017 21.08.2017
pro tempore, pending the interim application filed by the appellants in W.P.No.26656 of 2017. In view of the same, we are not inclined to entertain the writ appeal at this stage.
______________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
_________________________________
GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J
21 st August, 2017
GHN
S. Rajashaker Reddy and Others
The State of Telangana
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
Gudi Seva Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
