Second Appeal disposed of on consent. Appellant required six months to vacate suit premises subject to payment of admitted rent until 31.03.2018, which respondent agreed to accept via demand draft.
Time granted to vacate until 31.03.2018 upon payment of admitted rent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Second Appeal No.5 of 2017
JUDGMENT:
When the matter came up for hearing on admission, learned Senior Counsel Sri Vedula Venkataramana filed a memo and submitted that the instant appeal is filed against the dismissal of A.S.No.286 of 2013 dated 23.08.2016 passed by III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and that there are no substantial questions of law involved in the Second Appeal and in that view, the appellant requires six months time for vacating the suit premises and the respondent also agreed to accommodate the said time on the condition of appellant paying admitted rent of Rs.9,000/- from December, 2016 to 31.03.2018 (16 months) totalling Rs.1,44,000/-. He stated that the said amount is paid by way of demand draft No.081921 dated 13.09.2017 drawn on Axis Bank Limited in the name of respondent. To vacate the suit premises time is granted upto 31.03.2018 on which date the appellant would deliver vacant possession of the suit schedule premises to the respondent. Learned counsel thus requested to record the memo and close the appeal.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Date: 06.10.2017 Murthy
Unknown
Unknown
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
