Court modified a compensation award by substituting a multiplier of 17 in lieu of 18 for a deceased aged 27 years, aligning with Sarla Verma precedent, resulting in a revised amount.
Substituted multiplier '17' for '18' in the computed compensation and modified the award accordingly with costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMT JUSTICE T. RAJANI
M.A.C.M.A. No.248 of 2008
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is preferred by the appellant, who is 2nd respondent before the Court below, assailing the judgment of the X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in O.P. No.1281 of 2004 dated 05.04.2006 on the ground that the approach of the lower Court in adopting multiplier ‘18’ is not correct.
1 AIR 2009 SC 3104
2
to the extent indicated above and the rest of the award is left uninterfered with.
____________ T. RAJANI, J
Date:05.10.2017 knl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the multiplier adopted by the lower Court should be revised based on the deceased's age per Apex Court ruling.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sarla Verma vs Delhi Transport CorporationApplied¶6
Sarla Verma vs Delhi Transport Corporat ion
Appellant
Respondent 1
Respondent 2
Respondent 3
T. RAJANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
