Disposed

Chebrolu Ankamma Rao, v. D. Venkata Rao

Telangana HC8 Sept 2017MACMA/2192/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Motor Accidental Claims Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against an OP order. The High Court disposed of the appeal in terms of an award passed by the Lok Adalat dated 11.12.2021 without any order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

The appeal disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat award dated 11.12.2021; Court fee to be refunded; No costs.

Chebrolu Ankamma Rao, Vs D. Venkata Rao — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE ]USTICE G.SRI DEVI

¶5

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIWL MISCELLANEOUS AppEAL NO: 2198 OF 2008

¶6

Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the Order dated 11-2-2008 in OP.NO. 667 of 2006, dated 11-2-2008 on the file of the Chairman MACT IPrl. Dist.Judge] Nalgonda

¶7

Between:

¶8

The Natlonal Insurance Company Limited,, ' Rep.by its Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Regency House, Rajbhavan Road,

¶9

AND

¶10

,,...APPELLANT/ R-2

¶11

Pamula Venkataiah @ Venkati, S/o pichaiah bneing un sound person, rep.by his I/^ife^:T!.-Ptlalammg^{R/g ltlettacr,eruvu Village anJ tlandat, rvilqonai} oist.' lAmenoeo^asper orders in Ia.no.1g70 /2007 dt.23__g_2OOi)

¶12

S.Raja GopaL S/o KrishnaRao, age; major M/S Sri Lakshmi Transport Co.

¶13

Vijayawada Road, Jaggayapet, fiidtrna bist,^'

¶14

....,RESpONDENTS/pETTTIONERS & R_1

¶15

I.A, NO: 1OF 20O8(MACMAMp, NO: 4666 OF 2008)

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the_pe-tition, tn-e riigtr Court may be pleased ,i", ih; order passed in op.No. 667 0f 2006, ajtea rr-i-zooa on iie rire of the chairman MACT IPrl. Dist.Judge] Nalgonda

¶17

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI. N.MOHAN KRISHNA

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents; None

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

¶21

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI

¶22

M.A.C.M.A.No. 2198 of 2OO8

¶23

JUDGMENT:.

¶24

Pursuant to the request made by the Counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter was referred to Lok Adalat. On 11.12.2021 the matter was settled^before the Lok Adalat and an award was passed by the^Lok Adalath.

¶25

In view of the above, the^{M.A.C'M.A.is disposed} of in terms of the award,^{dated 11.12.2021,passedby the} Lok Adalat. There^{shall be no orderas to costs'}

¶26

Miscellaneous appiications,^{ifany, pending shal1}

¶27

stand closed.

¶28

Sd/^{-N'CHANDRASEKHAR-RAO} AssrsrANr^RtlgttrRAR //rRUE^coPY// ...rrofr#fr.r*

¶29

To,

¶30

(Arons w*h^{Award copv)}

¶31

l.lX?t["iJ.1]ili,,T..ll,I.'^{-R',fi'il1'^"rr,]g?3?3Biii"'"}

¶32

Two^{CD CoPies} 4, One^SpareCoPY

tr^VM A--

HIGH COURT

DATEDtLSl02l2022

ORDER MACMA.No.2198 of 2008

¶37

1P. E. S]A r6
(
(
+'
(:
oo t2$ APi] 2o??
J:.
-4
9&,."^- r" . -,.i<br>

¶38

l{0.

¶39

DISPOSING OF THEIC,M.A IN^{TERMS OF AWARDOF LOKADALATWITHOUT} cosTs.

v
6tt\oti
v),<br>

-l

{
,,1

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HtcH coURT LEGAL SERVTCES COM/,,ilTTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD.

¶44

lunder Section l9 of lhe tegol Servlces Authorllies Acl, l ggZ (Ce nlrol Act)J Date 1-12-2021

¶45

Present: 1.fion,ble Dr, Justice G.yethirajulu, Ctfairman (Foftner Judge,^{"-, ,,,eI} Hioh^Lourt c^{oferctwhleAh.rhrap.adesh)} Z, .Dr.J.Vijaya Lakshmi, Advocate, Member 3. Sri M.Venkatramar )a^yadav, Advocate, Member

¶46

MACMA No.2198of 2008

¶47

o{t

¶48

(Before the Hon,ble High Court)

¶49

AGAINST

¶50

o.P.No. 6 67 of 2006

¶51

(0n the fite of The Chairman, Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat (pRL District Judge):: at Nalgonaaj

¶52

Between:

¶53

iil:i;^{i ll'Hilff .TIH} :1"'.''' "', [i'ir]:'lil.Jj:::,*mgg1;,

¶54

fl [?,: ? 9,T3J 1L' 3!1 lll]1uu,

¶55

.....Appettant/R_2

¶56

AND

¶57

Vemuta Subbamma w/o, Late ye[aiah, Ageo lU years, Occ: Household.

¶58

I Y:::l:^{RamyaD/o. yerraiah,Aged} 1 years i J!ilxl3 l'111}il'-7""hx;3:;!I^Is;'ei6 v"u"' tAlr are r/o. Kandibanda ,,,,liYI'^{:d 45 vears'} ul;iri: **iiffi^{i rll:%x?,:[lf ijff i,.#.,,}

¶59

f^]-.9-"_ine^{.inor.represented byher} mother Herrrroner No.I herein i."., v#rt" Srli.uir.f

¶60

5.Raja Gopal S/o. Krishna R;
M/s. sriL;khmii;;;il ff,|,ffff, r"io.,
,lil:#I3i1i.*, Jassayapet, .

¶61

(Owner of the lorry bearing No.Ap 16 TU 4311)

¶62

j
... Responden ts
i
rl l
;,:"T""ou:.y

'..rrr<trd

AWARD

This^{is an appealfitedby the apPetlant/ lnsuranceComPany'}

¶68

The^{Learned Counset for the Appettant/ lnsuranceComPanyrepresentedthat the}

¶69

lnsurance^{Company is withdrawing the appealfitedby it'}

¶70

The^{saidrepresentationis recorded and theappeatis dismissedas withdrawn,} confirming^{the judgmentand decreeof the Court/Tribunatbetow'The amount} if any^{remaining unPaidto the ctaimant(s) shatt be paidby thelnsurance} Company^{withinone monthfrom the date of receipt of the award' atong with} interest'

¶71

The^{Respondents/Petitionersarepermitted to withdraw their respective shares}

¶72

as^{perthe apportionmentandorders made by the Tribunat/Lower Court'}

¶73

Court^{fee paid on this appeat shattbe refunded'}

¶74

No^costs.

¶75

t.
Ltd
6r=n arz=ra {
d Sign alor /f/r<br>Nof
Appettant / ResPondent
lns urance Com
G'.ISCg
MEMBER
MEMBER
CHAI
tee)

Chebrolu Ankamma Rao, v. D. Venkata Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chebrolu Ankamma Rao, v. D. Venkata Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. P. Jayasree Vs K. Narasimha (Major)

The Govt. of Andhra Pradesh Vs Munigeti Glory , Addanki Glory

SekharaMantri Narsinga Rao (Hindu) Vs Gnadipalli Satya Rao (Hindu)

The United India Insurance Company Limited Vs Gurrala Laxmi Varaprasad

P.Raju Vs K.Narasimha

Nelabatla Anjaneyulu Vs S. Narsimha