The court permitted the insurance company appellant to withdraw the appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn and closure of pending miscellaneous petitions.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; MACMA dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
M.A.C.M.A. No.1175 of 2016
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is filed by the insurance company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, challenging the judgment and decree dated 14.9.2011 passed in MVOP No.151 of 2010 on the file of the MACT-cum-II Additional District Judge (FTC), Srikakulam.
________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 26.4.2017 YS
Insurance Company and another
Respondent
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
