Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dismissed as it was a sequel to a consequential order already decided on the same day. No fresh legal issues were examined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI
I .T.T.A.No.37 of 2017
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The order impugned in this appeal is consequential to the order passed arising out of the revision. That appeal has already been dismissed by this Court by an order passed today in I.T.T.A.No.103 of 2017. Therefore, the present appeal, as a consequence, should also be dismissed. Hence it is dismissed.
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________ JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN __________________ JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI 22nd February, 2017 Js.
VRS,J & JUD,J. I.T.T.A.No.37/2017
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTI CE J. UMA DEVI
I .T.T.A.No.37 of 2017
Date: 22-02-2017
Js.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Revenue
Respondent
V. Ramasubramanian
J. Uma Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
