The court dismissed this civil revision petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the date of hearing when listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.686 OF 2013
ORDER :
When the matter was taken up on 02.06.2017, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was adjourned to 16.06.2017 with a direction to list under the caption ‘For Dismissal’.
None appeared even today when the matter is taken up.
Since the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, I am not inclined to adjourn the matter any further. Hence, this civil revision petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall
also stand dismissed. No costs.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date:16.06.2017 SP
Petitioner
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
