Allowed

Sajid Mohiuddin v. Chandrakanth

Telangana HC18 Aug 2017CRP/2764/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed the Civil Revision Petition upon recording submissions that the landlord and tenant had settled the matter amicably. Consequently, the impugned judgment of the City Small Causes Court was set aside, permitting the tenant to withdraw deposited arrears without security.

What did the court decide?

Impugned judgment set aside; respondent/tenant permitted to withdraw deposited rent arrears without furnishing security.

Sajid Mohiuddin Vs Chandrakanth — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI

¶2

C.R.P.M.P.No.4814 of 2015 IN/AND C.R.P.No.2764 OF 2015

¶3

COMMON ORDER:

¶4

This Civil Revision Petition, under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, is directed against the judgment, dated 21.01.2015, of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad, passed in R.A.No.31 of 2013.

¶5

By the said judgment, the learned appellate authority, while dismissing the appeal, confirmed the order, dated 08.02.2013, of the learned II Additional Rent Controller, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, passed in R.C.No.323 of 2010.

¶6

By the said orders, the Rent Controller permitted the respondent herein/tenant to deposit arrears of rent.

¶7

The respondent herein filed C.R.P.M.P.No.4814 of 2015 seeking to record the compromise entered into between him and the petitioner/landlord and allow the C.R.P.

¶8

At the hearing, learned senior counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/landlord and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/tenant would submit that the parties have settled the matter amicably and as per the terms of the settlement, this Civil Revision Petition is to be allowed by setting aside the judgment impugned in the revision petition.

¶9

¶10

Recording the submissions, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the judgment, dated 21.01.2015, of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, passed in R.A.No.31 of 2013 is hereby set aside. As a sequel, the respondent/tenant is permitted to withdraw the amounts deposited by him to the credit of R.C.No.323 of 2010 on the file of the learned II Additional Rent Controller, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad without furnishing any security. C.R.P.M.P.No.4814 of 2015 is closed.

¶11

Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, in the Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶12

______________________________________
JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Date: 18.08.2017
AMD

¶13

¶14

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI

¶15

C.R.P.M.P.No.4814 of 2015 IN/AND C.R.P.No.2764 OF 2015

¶16

DATE: 18.08.2017

¶17

AMD

Sajid Mohiuddin v. Chandrakanth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajid Mohiuddin v. Chandrakanth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ch.Amarnath, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Jafferuddin Siddiqi Vs Sri Hemendra v. Shah

K.Chakradhar Reddy , Chakradhar Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Pola Venkata Ramana Reddy Vs Somala Rani Devi

Alladi Madhava Rao, Vs Rachamadugu Laxman Rao

Thandra Suvarna Babu Vs K.Gopal