Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 challenging rejection of an interim application. The High Court disposed of the petition without merits, directing the appellate court to give the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to answer the query.
Direction to the appellate court to give the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to answer the query.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1974 OF 2017
ORDER:
This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.11.2016 in I.A. S.R. No.6435 of 2016 in A.S. No.294 of 2014 on the file of the Court of XXIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J.
Date: 20.4.2017 YS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellate court erred in rejecting the interim application solely due to non-compliance with a query.
Whether the petitioner should be given an opportunity to answer the query raised by the appellate court.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
T. SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
