including C.M.As and consequently I.A.Nos.781 & 780 of 2016 were heard. Thereupon, the petitioners filed I.A.No.1582 of 2016 in I.A.No.781 of 2016 and I.A.No.1583 of 2016 in I.A.No.780 of 2016 in O.S.No.306 of 2016 for amendment of two affidavits, on the ground that the petitioners filed a memo on the file of II Additional Chief judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad for withdrawal of O.S.No.501 of 2015. It is submitted that the memo is still pending and no order has been passed on the memo, granting permission to withdraw the suit and no suit is pending as such. Further, the petitioners did not seek any permission from the Court for filing fresh on from the same cause of action. Therefore, the memo itself would constitute withdrawal of the suit and no further order is required. When the petitions came up for hearing, the Trial Court posted both the interlocutory applications for orders, in view of the directions issued by this Court in C.M.A.No.845 of 2016. Since the petitioners filed memo to withdraw O.S.No.501 of 2015, the petitioner is not required to disclose the proceedings in earlier suit O.S.No.501 of 2015 and incidental proceedings therein. But, in view of the objections, the petitioner sought for amendment of the affidavit, seeking leave of the Court to add paragraph 23 in the affidavit in I.A.No.1582 of 2016 in I.A.No.781 of 2016 and I.A.No.1583 of 2016 in I.A.No.780 of 2016 in O.S.No.306 of 2016. The respondents did not file any counter but advanced arguments during hearing.
