K. Rameshji and 2 Others v. the Joint Collector, R.R. Dist and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY…
SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
C.R.P.No.1404 OF 2011
ORDER :
Despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither learned counsel for the petitioners appeared nor they represented themselves or through any counsel.
Sri K.S.Gopala Krishnan, learned counsel for the respondents represented that during pendency of the revision petition this Court directed the 3rd respondent not to create third party interest in and over the property in question and that the appeal filed by petitioners 1 to 3 itself is dismissed. Therefore, the revision petition is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed and the interim order granted earlier is deemed to have been vacated automatically. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this petition shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
22.01.2018 kvrm
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court