Court dismissed civil revision petition challenging dismissal of injunction extension application after parties settled dispute before Lok Adalat. Petition declared infructuous.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous due to Lok Adalat settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1096 of 2013
ORDER :
This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed challenging the docket order, dated 31.01.2013, passed in Interlocutory Application No.19 of 2013 in Interlocutory Application No.55 of 2012 in Original Suit No.3 of 2012, by the Junior Civil Judge, Srikakulam, whereby, the petition filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘C.P.C’), to extend the interim injunction granted in Interlocutory Application No.55 of 2012 in Original Suit No.3 of 2012, was dismissed.
___________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
JUNE 23, 2017 YVL
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1096 of 2013
Date: 23.06.2017
YVL
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
