Civil revision petition was dismissed for non-prosperation as petitioners failed to appear despite listing under a dismissal caption.
Civil revision petition dismissed for non-prosperation; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
C.R.P.No.1061 of 2017
ORDER:
On 06.06.2017 when the matter was called there was no representation for the petitioners, hence, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite listing the matter under the caption for dismissal none appear for the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the case. Therefore, the civil revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the criminal petition,
shall stand closed.
__________________________________
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY J
Date: 19.06.2017
kvrm
Petitioners
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
