Disposed

Pathan Feroz Khan, v. Mohammad Mirza Najma

Telangana HC8 Mar 2017CRLRC/597/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble Court disposed of the criminal revision filed by the husband assailing an interim maintenance order of Rs.5,000 granted to the wife. The Court directed the learned judge to dispose of the application on merits within one month.

What did the court decide?

Directed the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge to dispose of the interim maintenance application on merits within one month.

Pathan Feroz Khan, Vs Mohammad Mirza Najma — Maintenance and Alimony | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI CRI MI NAL REVI SI ON CASE No.597 OF 2017

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner/husband, under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, assailing the docket order, dated 25.10.2016, of the learned XIV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada of Krishna District, whereby the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, while considering the request of the respondent-wife for grant of interim maintenance @ Rs.25,000/- per month, awarded interim maintenance @ Rs.5,000/- per month with effect from October, 2016.

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioner-husband would submit as follows: A detailed counter has been filed before the Court below stating fairly that the income of the petitioner-husband ranges from Rs.2,00,000/to Rs.2,50,000/- per annum and also the responsibility he has in maintaining other members of the family and to discharge the loans, which he has contracted for the marriage of the sister of the respondent-wife. The respondent-wife has taken away substantial gold and other articles from the matrimonial home. The order impugned was passed without assigning reasons. Therefore, the order is unsustainable and is liable to be set aside.

¶5

I have carefully perused the counter and also the petition filed by the respondent–wife for award of interim maintenance. In the considered view of this Court, the submissions in the counter of the petitioner-

¶6

husband require detailed consideration at the time of passing final orders in the application for interim maintenance, but not at the stage of the interim order. Be that as it may, in view of the contentions of the petitioner-husband, this Court is satisfied that the revision petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission with appropriate directions.

¶7

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of directing the learned XIV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, to dispose of Crl.M.P.No.84 of 2016 in M.C.No.272 of 2014, on merits, however, in strict adherence to the procedure established by law, as expeditiously as possible, and preferably within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand closed.

¶9

__________________________ M.SEETHARAMA MURTI , J

¶10

Date:08.03.2017 INL

Pathan Feroz Khan, v. Mohammad Mirza Najma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pathan Feroz Khan, v. Mohammad Mirza Najma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamal Singh , Kawal Singh Vs The State of Telangana

P.Kishore Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

G. Srinivasa Rao, Vs The Director General ( Personnel)

P. Gopi Vs The Depot Manager

Sri S.Sudhakar, Vs Apsrtc, Rep by Vice Chairman and Managing Director

V.Swarajya Lakshmi Vs The Chairman and Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh