of private defence put an end to the life of two persons snatching gun and pistol from the hands of the 2nd respondent, who made an attempt against these petitioners. The revisional Court by exercising power under Section 397 Cr.P.C. passed the order illegally without considering the material facts and committed an error, hence, requested to set aside the order passed by the Sessions Judge. 5. It is the case of the 2nd respondent that on 09.06.2013 at about 06.00 PM Ravichandra Reddy-A2, Ramanath Reddy-A3, Kadiyam Naga Subba Reddy @ Kodigandla Subba Reddy-A6 came to the houses of Brahmananda Reddy, at that time Brahmananda Reddy was not in the village and that complainant and deceased No.1 were present at the house of Brahmananda Reddy. A2, A3 and A6 told the 2nd respondent and deceased No.1 that A1 sent them for discussions with regard to setting up of candidates for panchayat elections. As Brahmananda Reddy was not readily available, the complainant and deceased No.1 started going to the house of A1 and on their way in the village, they crossed Deceased No.2, who also followed them to Himakuntal village. The complainant, deceased Nos.1 and 2 were taken to the farm house of A1, where all the accused were already present, as if waiting for Brahmananda Reddy. On seeing the complainant, deceased Nos.1 and 2, A2 asked complainant, deceased No.1 as to why Brahmananda Reddy did not come. Then they told that he was not in the village and went to elsewhere, then A1 flared up saying that Brahmananda Reddy without consulting him trying to set up candidates for the village panchayat elections in Simhadripuram Mandal and started abusing Brahmananda Reddy in filthy language. Thereupon, deceased Nos.1 and 2 also retaliated by abusing A1, there was a scuffle. A1 to A3 and A6 picked up eethapululu (hunting sickles) and A4, A5 and A7 picked up iron rods, which were lying in the farm house. Then A1 attacked the complainant
