This order dismisses a petition seeking condonation of a 503-day delay in filing a criminal revision. The court held that ignorance of law and poverty are not sufficient grounds, as the petitioner failed to avail legal aid services.
The petition for condonation of delay is dismissed; the main revision is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CRL.R.C.M.P.NO.2226 OF 2017 IN/ AND CRL.R.C.NO.1379 OF 2017
ORDER:
Crl.R.C.M.P.No.2226 of 2017 is filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone delay of 503 days in preferring the revision against the order dt.28.10.2014 in M.C.No.11 of 2011 passed by the Judge, Family Courtcum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirupathi awarding maintenance.
2
______________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J
DATE:07-08-2017
ccm
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CRL.R.C.M.P.NO.2226 OF 2017 IN/ AND
CRL.R.C.NO.1379 OF 2017
Date:07.08.2017
ccm
2 issues framed by the court
Whether ignorance of law and poverty are valid grounds to condone a delay of 503 days in filing a criminal revision.
Whether the petitioner approached the Legal Services Authority before filing the revision petition with undue delay.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. SatyNarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
