V.Satyanarayana, Hyderabad., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶2

Crl.P.M.P.Nos.13808 and 13809 of 2017

¶3

IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9425 of 2016

¶4

COMMON ORDER :

¶5

Crl.P.M.P.Nos. 13808 and 13809 of 2017

¶6

These two Petitions are filed under Section 320(2) and 320(6) Cr.P.C. seeking leave of this Court to compound the offences punishable under Sections 427, 323, 504, 120-B IPC and Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and to record compromise in C.C.No.683 of 2016 on the file of 9^th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, as the matter is settled as they entered into compromise outside of the Court due to invention of elders.

¶7

De facto complaint and the petitioner/ accused are present in person and they are identified by their respective counsel and they also produced the copies of Aadhar Cards in proof of their identity.

¶8

On enquiry, the parties stated that they settled the issue outside the Court due to intervention of elders and well-wishers and they intend to lead peaceful life.

¶9

In the above circumstances, these two Petitions are ordered permitting the parties to compound the said offences to record compromise.

¶10

Crl.P.No.9425 of 2016

¶11

In view of the orders passed in Crl.P.M.P.Nos. 13808 and 13809 of 2017, the present Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.683 of 2016 on the file of 9^th Additional Chief Metropolitan

¶12

Magistrate at Hyderabad, are quashed. The Registry is directed to annex

¶13

a copy of the joint compromise memo to this order.

¶14

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall

¶15

stand dismissed.

¶16

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶17

Dt.15.12.2017 eha

¶18

3

¶19

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶20

eha

¶21

Crl.P.M.P.Nos.13808 and 13809 of 2017
IN/AND
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9425 of 2016
Dt.15-12-2017

V.Satyanarayana, Hyderabad., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Satyanarayana, Hyderabad., v. the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Madhusudhan Rao, Hyderabad., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp.

Mohd Abdul Mohsin Khan and 2 Others Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

M/S. Golden Mattresses Pvt., Ltd., and 5 Others Vs the State of a.P., and Another

Bulusu Venkata Rama Sharma, East Godavari Dt., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

M/S.Sree Sai Teja Industries and Another Vs M/S. Chandrasons and Another Rep. by P.P.

G.Yashwanth Reddy , Haswanth Reddy Vs the State of a.P.,Rep.,Pp and Another