The Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR, noting that the investigating agency had completed the investigation and filed a charge sheet, rendering the petition infructuous.
Criminal Petition No.8896 of 2011 dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TH E H ON’BLE SRI J USTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTH Y
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8896 of 2011
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’), is filed t o quash the proceedings in Crime No.118 of 2011 on the file of Veenavanka P.S., Karimnagar District, registered for the offences punishable under Section 294 IPC.
During hearing, learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana, brought to the notice of this Court that entire investigation in this case is completed by the Investigating agency and filed charge sheet before the concerned court, which is numbered as C.C.No.574 of 2011.
In view of the representation made by the learned Public Prosecutor,
there is nothing to be examined and decided by the Court in the above crime.
Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition, shall stand dismissed.
__________________________ M. Sa tya n a r a ya n a Mu r th y, J
16th March, 2017 eha
TH E H ON’BLE SRI J USTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTH Y
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8896 of 2011
Dt. 16-3-2017
eha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition for quashing proceedings can be allowed when investigation is completed and charge sheet has been filed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State of Telangana
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
