Common order dismissing Criminal Petitions 8630 and 8631 of 2017. The Hon'ble Court held that quashing proceedings at this stage was inappropriate and directed petitioners to defend before the concerned Magistrate Court.
All criminal petitions were dismissed; petitioners directed to appear before the Court of IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.8630 and 8631 of 2017
COMMON ORDER:
It is seen that charge sheet is filed and case is registered as CC No. 2055 of 2016 on the file of IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally at Hyderabad.
Having regard to the prima facie nature of the case and its stage, it is not appropriate to quash the proceedings. While dismissing both the Criminal Petitions, petitioners are directed to appear before the concerned Court and vindicate their
defenses. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand
closed.
_________________________
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Date: 19.09.2017
KA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under CC No. 2055 of 2016 should be quashed.
The Petitioners
The State
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
