The Court disposed of the anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by relying on a prior order dated 05.09.2017 in a related quashing petition (Crl.P.No.8231 of 2017), which had directed authorities not to arrest the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8193 OF 2017
ORDER :
This petition is filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner-A1 for the offences alleged under Sections 498-A IPC and 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
___________________________ DR.SHAMEEM AKTHER, J
DATED: 06-11-2017 Hsd
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. needs independent disposal after a related quashing petition.
Whether the order in the prior quashing petition extends to this anticipatory bail petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
RAJESH SHARMA & OTHERS V STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHERReferred¶6
RAJESH SHARMA & OTHERS V STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
3 provisions across 3 enactments
PETITIONER-A1
STATE
SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
