Allowed

Mirza Afzal Ahmed Baig v. Syed Abdul Hameed

Telangana HC15 Feb 2017CRLP/769/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed two Criminal Petitions seeking to quash criminal proceedings initiated against accused persons in a family dispute. Upon confirmation of an out-of-court settlement and compromise executed between the parties, the proceedings were quashed and the complaintant's case was disposed of without trial.

What did the court decide?

The criminal proceedings against Accused Nos.1 to 3 in Calendar Case No.79 of 2016 were quashed, and the joint compromise memo was recorded.

Mirza Afzal Ahmed Baig Vs Syed Abdul Hameed — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION M.P. Nos.723 AND 724 OF 2017

¶2

IN/AND

¶3

CRIMINAL PETITION No.769 OF 2017

¶4

COMMON ORDR:

¶5

The present Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Code’), is filed by the petitioners - accused Nos.1 to 3 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Calendar Case No.79 of 2016 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Excise) at Karimnagar, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 and 506 read with 34 IPC against accused Nos.1 and 2 and Section 384 IPC against accused No.3.

¶6

Criminal Petition M.P. No.723 of 2017 is filed by the de facto complainant, who is respondent No.1 in the main criminal petition, along with his affidavit duly signed and a joint memo signed by both the parties, requesting to permit him to compound the case in the aforesaid Calendar Case.

¶7

Criminal Petition M.P. No.724 of 2017 is filed by the petitioners, requesting to permit them to compromise the case in the aforesaid Calendar Case.

¶8

One Syed Ahmed S/o Syed Abdul Raheem, the father and GPA Holder of de facto complainant, who is respondent No.1 in the main petition, is present and filed the General Power of Attorney. The

¶9

ASN,J Crl.P. No.769 of 2017

¶10

¶11

petitioners - accused Nos.1 to 3 are also present. The parties are indentified by their respective learned counsel, Sri M. Ram Mohan Reddy and Sri Giri Krishna Reddy, who are also present. The parties have also produced photostat copies of their respective “Aadhaar Cards” in proof of their identity.

¶12

Perused the affidavit and the joint memo signed by both the parties stating that they have settled the matter outside the Court and the relevant deeds said to have executed have been mentioned in paragraph No.3 and, finally, request to quash the proceedings in the aforesaid Calendar Case by recording a compromise.

¶13

Since the father of de facto complainant and the petitioners - accused Nos.1 to 3 have affirmed the contents of joint memo, the compromise is recorded as it is a family dispute and falls within the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab¹ .

¶14

Therefore, Criminal Petition M.P. Nos.723 and 724 of 2017 are allowed and, consequently, the present Criminal Petition is allowed quashing the proceedings against the petitioners - Accused Nos.1 to 3 in Calendar Case No.79 of 2016 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Excise) at Karimnagar. The joint memo shall form part of the record.

¶15

(2012) 10 SCC 303

¶16

ASN,J 3 Crl.P. No.769 of 2017

¶17

As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in

¶18

the Criminal Petition stand closed.

¶19

A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J

¶20

February 15, 2017. Mgr

Mirza Afzal Ahmed Baig v. Syed Abdul Hameed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mirza Afzal Ahmed Baig v. Syed Abdul Hameed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Jha Vs The State of Telangana

Naveen Kumar Agarwal Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

J. Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Angalakurthi Venkata Swamy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt.Vattikuti Rajeswari Vs Vattikuti Anantha lakshmi

Ahamad Khan , Ahmed Abdul Haq Khan Vs The State of Telangana