Disposed
Chelluboina Ravi Kiran Yadav, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Telangana HCCRLP/6771/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION…
What the court decided
AI extract
B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6771 of 2017
ORDER:
The petitioners are A.1 to A.5 of C.C.No.95 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Giddalur, Prakasam District, where the learned Magistrate taken cognizance for the offences punishable under Section 498-A IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, which is outcome of Crime No.4 of 2017 dated 16.01.2017, on the report of the 2nd respondent-defacto complainant no other than wife of the 1st petitioner/ A.1.
The police after investigation filed final report and the learned Magistrate taken cognizance for the above said offences. At the post cognizance stage, the quash petition is filed.
The petitioners can raise all these contentions before the trial Court at the stage of hearing before charges, if necessary by filing application under Section 239 Cr.P.C. and it is also left open to file application under Rule 37 of the Criminal Rules of Practice to consider after hearing for one to represent others.
2
Dr.SSRB,J
In view of the order of this court dated 31.07.2017 in Crl.P.No.6493 of 2017 relying upon the latest two Judge Bench expression of the Apex Court dated 27.07.2017 in Crl.A.1265 of 2017 (SLP (Crl.) No.2013 of 2017 in Rajesh Sharma & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another ), the matter requires to be referred by the learned trial Magistrate to the Committee to be constituted for report to consider any reconciliation and settlement and if it is not settled, then to proceed with trial on merits.
Accordingly and in the result, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE Dr. B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Date: 04.08.2017 pab
Dr. B. Siva Sankara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court