The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal and stay petition against an exparte order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 23 of the Act, waiving limitation expiry.
Liberty to file appeal and stay petition with the Court of Session without insisting on limitation expiry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6377 OF 2017
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned public prosecutor, representing the 1st respondent – State, before ordering notice to the 2nd respondent and also perused the impugned order dated 03.05.2017, Crl.M.P.No.697 of 2017 in pending D.V.C.No.13 of 2017, passed by the VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District.
DR.B.SIVA SANKARA RAO,J
16.08.2017 SS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court of Session should entertain an appeal against an exparte order under Section 23 of the Act.
Petitioner
State
2nd Respondent
B. Siva Sankara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
