Court disposed of the criminal petition without deciding on merits, allowing petitioners to defend via affidavit and permitting one petitioner to represent others in person.
CrP disposed leaving defenses available; petitioners permitted to file affidavit under Rule 37 CPC; one petitioner allowed to represent others personally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3446 OF 2017
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/ A.3 to A.7 and A.9 to A.12 in C.C. No.4 of 2016 seeking to quash institution and continuation of proceedings in said case on the file of III Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Visakhapatnam registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B r/ w 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 and 477-A of I.P.C and Section 13 (2) r/ w 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
permit one of the petitioners/ A.3 to 7 and A.9 to A.12 to represent others as and when personal appearance is required.
Dt.28.04.2017 Knl
2
Dr SSRB, J Crlrc_846_2017
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3446 OF 2017
Date:28.04.2017
knl
3
Dr SSRB, J Crlrc_846_2017
A.3 to A.7 and A.9 to A.12
State represented by CBI
B. Siva Sankara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
