A criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash proceedings was dismissed as infructuous. The Public Prosecutor submitted the final investigation report, leading the Court to dismiss the petition without further orders.
Q.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRIMINAL PETITION No.3118 of 2011
ORDER:
This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash
the proceedings against the petitioners/A.2 and A.3 in Crime No.68 of 2011 of Market Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 384, 417, 420, 406 and 506 of IPC read with Section 34 of IPC.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Public Prosecutor submitted that after conducting investigation, the police filed a final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C., and
therefore, no further orders need be passed in this Criminal Petition and the Criminal Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of aforesaid submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, in this Criminal Petition shall stand dismissed.
______________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J 8th MARCH, 2017.
kvni
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after the investigation report.
Whether to maintain criminal proceedings against accused for offences including cheating and criminal breach of trust.
Whether the criminal petition stands dismissed as infructuous following the final police report.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioners/A.2 and A.3
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
