Hearing a Section 438 Cr.P.C. petition for anticipatory bail, the court directed the investigating agency to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and the Arunesh Kumar guidelines. The petition was disposed of.
Direction to investigating agency to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Arunesh Kumar guidelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2834 OF 2017
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) is filed to grant prearrest bail to the petitioners/A.2 to A.6 apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.19 of 2017 of Metpalli Police Station, Jagtial District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘I.P.C.’) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
disposed of.
___________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
13.04.2017 knl
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2834 OF 2017
Date:13.04.2017
knl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Arunesh Kumar guidelines in a Section 438 Cr.P.C. petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
ARNESH KUMAR V. STATE OF BIHARReferred¶5
(2014) 8 SCC 273 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner/A.2 to A.6
State of Andhra Pradesh
M SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
