Single-line order where the court held a criminal petition to be infructuous and dismissed it; miscellaneous petitions to be closed due to cognizance taken below.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.15605 OF 2014
ORDER:
No representation for the petitioners – accused Nos.2 to 5.
Pradesh would represent that on filing of Charge Sheet, the I Additional District Judge, Eluru, has taken cognizance of the case in Special S.C.No.60 of 2016 and, therefore, the present petition
becomes infructuous.
dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J February 22, 2017. MD
Petitioner (Accused Nos. 2 to 5)
State
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
