Abdul Mathin and Anr. v. the State of Telangana and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition to quash FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed as infructuous because the legal dispute was already compromised before the LokAdalat.
Petition to quash FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed as infructuous because the legal dispute was already compromised before the LokAdalat.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.12383 OF 2016
ORDER :
This petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short “Cr.P.C.”) to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.231 of 2016 on the file of Adilabad I Town Police Station, Adilabad District.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
Learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana represented that the matter is already compromised before LokAdalat and prayed to dismiss the petition.
Recording the said submission, the petition is dismissed as
infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand dismissed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
19.12.2017 Ksp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition seeking quashment of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed as infructuous since the matter was already compromised at LokAdalat.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State of Telangana
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court