Petitioner sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous since the police had already filed the charge sheet, rendering the petition devoid of utility.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; consequentially miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.1 2 2 1 7 of 2 0 1 6
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) is filed to quash the proceedings in FIR No.422 of 2016 on the file of R.C. Puram Police Station, Medak District, registered for the offence under Section 307 IPC.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/A2.
Learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana, represented that that the Police have already filed charge sheet and hence, the instant petition, which is filed for quashment of the Proceedings in FIR No.422 of 2016 has became infructuous and prayed to dismiss the petition.
Recording the said submission, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, in this case, shall stand closed.
____________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Date: 8.12.2017 eha
2
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Cr l.P. No.1 2 2 1 7 of 2 0 1 6
Dt. 8.12.2017
eha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition filed to quash offending proceedings is maintainable after a charge sheet has been filed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner/A2
State
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
