Single judge held that Section 482 CrPC proceedings to quash Domestic Violence Act proceedings are not sustainable when an efficacious remedy exists under Section 29 DV Act, 2005, following Gaddameedi Nagamani.
Criminal Petition to quash D.V.C proceedings dismissed; mentions Gaddameedi Nagamani case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE Dr . JUSTI CE SHAMEEM AKTHER
Cr im in al Pet it ion No.1 1 8 3 of 2 0 1 7
ORDER :
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Petition, 1973, is filed by the petitioner, to quash the proceedings in D.V.C.No.9 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District.
2 . Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor (Telangana) appearing for the 1st respondent-State and perused the record.
3 . The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there are material irregularities in the D.V.C. application. The Court below ought not to have taken cognizance and the DVC proceedings on file. Therefore, the proceedings in D.V.C.No.9 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District, are liable to be quashed.
4 . On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor, relying on the decision of this Court in Gaddam eedi Nagam an i Vs. Th e St at e of Telan gan a an d ot h er s1 , submitted that the appropriate remedy is available to the petitioner under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and that the proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, are not sustainable.
5 . It is evident from the record that the Court below had initiated proceedings in D.V.C.No.9 of 2015 against the petitioner and the same are pending before it. In Gaddam eedi Nagam an i ’s case 11 2015 (2) ALD (Crl.) 764 (AP)
Dr.SA, J CRL.P.No.1183 of 2017
2
referred supra , this Court held that taking cognizance and numbering the D.V.C. is within the meaning of the order used in Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and against which, once there is an efficacious remedy is available by way of appeal under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, are not sustainable.
6 . The facts of the cited case are squarely applicable to the facts of the instant case. When an efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, by way of appeal before the appropriate forum, it is not appropriate to determine the contentions raised by the petitioners in this Criminal Petition, which is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.
23rd October, 2017 Bvv
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the proceedings under Section 482 of CrPC are sustainable when an efficacious remedy is available under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005?
Whether the D.V.C. proceedings initiated by the Court below are liable to be quashed due to material irregularities?
Is the course of conduct squashed citing Gaddameedi Nagamani case holding Section 29 as the appropriate remedy?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gaddameedi Nagamani Vs. State of TelanganaRelied on¶7
Gaddameedi Nagamani Vs. The State of Telangana and others, 112 2015 (2) ALD (Crl.) 764 (AP)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
PETITIONER
STATE OF TELANGANA
SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
