Court dismissed the criminal petition as infructuous because the underlying case had already ended in acquittal, rendering adjudication unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TH E H ON’BLE SRI J USTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTH Y CRIMINAL PETITION No.10 139 of 20 11
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’), is filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.397 of 2009 on the file of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Bhongir, Nalgonda District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8 (e) of A.P. Prohibition Act and Section 34 (e) of A.P. Excise Act.
During hearing, th e learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana, represented that C.C.No.397 of 2009 on the file of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Bhongir, Nalgonda District, ended in acquittal, vide judgment dated 2.2.2016. In that view of the matter, the cause in this Criminal Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand dismissed.
__________________________ M. Sa tya n a r a ya n a Mu r th y, J
13th March, 2017 eha
2
TH E H ON’BLE SRI J USTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTH Y
CRIMINAL PETITION No.10 139 of 20 11 Dt.13.0 3.20 17
eh a
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
